Peru Presidential Election

This is the place for ON or Off topic conversations. Almost anything goes - but be kind, and no trolling.
Forum rules
While the rules in this forum are more relaxed than in other parts of the Expat site, there are still a few things we’d like you to remember: No name calling, no insults – be civil to each other!
clewis564
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 56
Joined: Thu May 09, 2013 4:27 pm

Peru Presidential Election

Postby clewis564 » Sun Mar 13, 2016 8:13 pm

Does anyone have any opinions about the Peru presidential election? DO you think Fujimori winning would help or hurt the peruvian economy? Does anyone have a preferred candidate? Just wondering.


Alpineprince
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 1457
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 8:12 pm
Location: "Miraflores State of Mind"

Re: Peru Presidential Election

Postby Alpineprince » Mon Mar 14, 2016 11:17 am

PPK :D
User avatar
Polaron
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 833
Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2009 5:56 pm
Location: Lima
Contact:

Re: Peru Presidential Election

Postby Polaron » Mon Mar 14, 2016 4:07 pm

It's an Open Secret that the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency is supporting one of the political parties. Interesting lead this political party is not in first place at this time.
Professional, bilingual writer at your service.
clewis564
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 56
Joined: Thu May 09, 2013 4:27 pm

Re: Peru Presidential Election

Postby clewis564 » Mon Mar 14, 2016 4:11 pm

I just saw two candidates got disqualified because of paperwork issues. Julio Guzmán César Acuña. That makes it easier for fijimori I guess.
User avatar
caliguy
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 1210
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2012 3:55 pm
Location: Lima-13

Re: Peru Presidential Election

Postby caliguy » Mon Mar 14, 2016 6:56 pm

clewis564 wrote:I just saw two candidates got disqualified because of paperwork issues. Julio Guzmán César Acuña. That makes it easier for fijimori I guess.

seems it's going to be between Fujimori and Kuczynski. my bet is on Fujimori (popular force). i think both candidates would do good for the country. (jmo)
every place has it's own spirit. you just need to tune into it.
ironchefchris
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 1642
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2012 11:10 pm
Location: Arequipa

Re: Peru Presidential Election

Postby ironchefchris » Mon Mar 14, 2016 8:51 pm

Polaron wrote:It's an Open Secret that the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency is supporting one of the political parties. Interesting lead this political party is not in first place at this time.

Who would that be?
User avatar
Alan
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 2771
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2005 5:10 pm
Contact:

Re: Peru Presidential Election

Postby Alan » Tue Mar 15, 2016 9:46 am

ironchefchris wrote:
Polaron wrote:It's an Open Secret that the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency is supporting one of the political parties. Interesting lead this political party is not in first place at this time.

Who would that be?


We could tell you, but.... we'd have to shoot you afterwards. Sorry about that.

For me the biggest surprise (in an election full of surprises) is the rise of Alfredo Barenachea. Will he become the "new face" that voters seem to be looking for? The other big surprise (for me, anyway) is how badly Garcia seems to be doing. It's a fickle crowd.
jhand8pp4
Silver Member
Silver Member
Posts: 48
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2015 2:42 pm

Re: Peru Presidential Election

Postby jhand8pp4 » Tue Mar 15, 2016 2:40 pm

I agree with Caliguy that either Fujimori or Kuczynski would be good for Peru. Also, I think that Garcia is doing badly because people are tired of politicians who have indications of corruption.
User avatar
Alan
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 2771
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2005 5:10 pm
Contact:

Re: Peru Presidential Election

Postby Alan » Tue Mar 15, 2016 3:20 pm

jhand8pp4 wrote:I agree with Caliguy that either Fujimori or Kuczynski would be good for Peru. Also, I think that Garcia is doing badly because people are tired of politicians who have indications of corruption.


Yes, that's true, but he still has not only his party, but the PPC behind him, and in spite of that, he's still in the basement. Let's see what the debates might hold. The guy can sell ice cream in a snowstorm.

Has anyone heard when the debates are to be held?
woodchuck
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 569
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2016 1:43 pm

Re: Peru Presidential Election

Postby woodchuck » Wed Mar 16, 2016 7:37 am

I also would like to know who the US Central Intelligence Agency is sponsoring! Please don't make such statements w/o having some sort of data the readers can check - please!!! :roll:
User avatar
JoshuS
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 307
Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 9:40 am

Re: Peru Presidential Election

Postby JoshuS » Wed Mar 16, 2016 12:24 pm

Keiko is the candidate of preference by the US, the Peruvian elite and of course the CONFIEP, I wouldn’t be surprised if she’s getting funded covertly through NGOs (typical US modus operandi around the world, amply documented), USAID or others including the CIA, why not. She was invited by the David Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies and Weatherhead Center for International Affairs (Harvard) to conduct a talk there last year in September, it’s customary for third world presidential candidates who represent Washington’s interests while having a good chance at winning to get invited to these type of events. After all, her father was the artificer of coining Neo Liberal doctrinal policies in the Peruvian Constitution after his self-coup in 1992, policies which govern the Peruvian economy nowadays to the detriment of majority of Peruvians.

PPK is a back-up option in my opinion, talk about “barbarian at the gates”, he’s already inside the gates, PPK represents a veritable Trojan horse who will do nothing more than do what he does best, finish selling Peruvian resources to the best international takers as the good international capital lobbyist he is. He’s the reason why most of Camisea gas is exported abroad at fire sale prices while Peruvians, those who get it pay for it through the nose, such as ironically Cuzquenos those who live where Camisea gas comes from.
ironchefchris
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 1642
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2012 11:10 pm
Location: Arequipa

Re: Peru Presidential Election

Postby ironchefchris » Thu Mar 17, 2016 9:01 am

Keiko would have been my guess as far as US supported candidates, but Polaron mentioned "Interesting lead this political party is not in first place at this time."

In my few years here, just about every person I've talked politics/elections with says pretty much the same thing - they're all corrupt. With the exception of a congressional candidate who wanted a donation from me, not a single person I've spoken with has any faith or confidence in the political system as an agent of change for the betterment for the people. It's interesting to contrast this to the U.S. (where I'm from) where people get very passionate about politics and politicians and believe that politician or party X is either the solution or the cause of all problems.

The last US presidential election only had a turnout of about 57%. I would imagine if voting wasn't mandatory in Perú and considering the general apathy that I've noticed it would be even less here. High voter turnout when voting is voluntary says that people have faith in their political system. Near 100% turnout when voting is mandatory is meaningless for gauging the people's confidence in the political system. Mandatory voting is a convenient way to lend legitimacy to a system that the people lack confidence in. Imagine if only 20% of eligible voters felt strong enough about their candidate/party to actually vote and the winner won with 51%. That would mean only 5.1% of the people supported the winner. Mandatory voting gives the impression that the winner has greater support than they likely do.

Just my cinco centimos.
User avatar
JoshuS
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 307
Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 9:40 am

Re: Peru Presidential Election

Postby JoshuS » Thu Mar 17, 2016 2:28 pm

The Peruvian political system is definitely corrupt; most politicians would just aspire to be part of that system in order to rob one way or another. Fujimori’s administration institutionalized it even more by coining Neo Liberal policies in the Constitution at the behest of big capital, akin to what Pinochet did for Chile via the Chicago Boys (Milton Friedman) back in 1973 after the successful CIA backed coup against Allende. A first step for an honest and serious presidential candidate if there’s one would be to modify the constitution by expunging such NL policies from it and by willingly renegotiating fairly all those onerous contracts which for the most part only benefit transnationals at the expense of the majority of Peruvians.

Well, in the US corruption is pretty much the same, only more sophisticated under a veil of the ‘best kabuki democracy money can buy’. Politicians are just there to preserve the status quo, be it Republican or Democrat (Pepsi or Coca-Cola) where presidential candidates get not elected but selected by those who control the system. The founding fathers knew this all too well, hence the rigged electoral process designed to prevent the “wrong people from getting into power” through mechanisms such as Delegates, Super Delegates and the Electoral College, and if all that fails then there is always the rigged computer poll programs: http://www.activistpost.com/2016/03/wat ... tions.html

http://truthinmedia.com/report-lobbyist ... delegates/
http://truthinmedia.com/republican-dele ... n-process/

I think Mrs. Clinton is the anointed one for this November.
Mandatory voting is not way to guarantee or prove anything for sure, then again whether it is mandatory or not the system is rigged anyway.
User avatar
gringolandia
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 308
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 5:34 pm

Re: Peru Presidential Election

Postby gringolandia » Thu Mar 17, 2016 8:30 pm

Whoever is elected I hope it is a realist who understands that the only reason Peru is enjoying any economic success is due to the country embracing capitalism and transnational corporations.

It isn't "fair" of course. Of course the transnational corporations take a large part of the wealth that Peruvian feel is "theirs", otherwise the transnationals wouldn't have any incentive to enter into the agreements in the first place. There are certainly aspects of such partnerships that require vigilance, adjustment and correction to make sure Peru gets the best deal it can manage.

But the day Peru votes in someone who rejects these policies is the day Peru joins the other South American basket cases and falls into economic oblivion. Peru simply can't exploit its resources by itself. It doesn't have the internal capability to do so. Not even close.
curveball

Re: Peru Presidential Election

Postby curveball » Fri Mar 18, 2016 6:58 am

gringolandia wrote:Whoever is elected I hope it is a realist who understands that the only reason Peru is enjoying any economic success is due to the country embracing capitalism and transnational corporations.

It isn't "fair" of course. Of course the transnational corporations take a large part of the wealth that Peruvian feel is "theirs", otherwise the transnationals wouldn't have any incentive to enter into the agreements in the first place. There are certainly aspects of such partnerships that require vigilance, adjustment and correction to make sure Peru gets the best deal it can manage.

But the day Peru votes in someone who rejects these policies is the day Peru joins the other South American basket cases and falls into economic oblivion. Peru simply can't exploit its resources by itself. It doesn't have the internal capability to do so. Not even close.



But if the global economy is in free fall then embracing capitalism won't matter.
It will have a domino effect.
User avatar
caliguy
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 1210
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2012 3:55 pm
Location: Lima-13

Re: Peru Presidential Election

Postby caliguy » Sun Mar 20, 2016 5:40 pm

Alan wrote:Has anyone heard when the debates are to be held?

Date, Time and Place: The electoral debate between presidential candidates on Sunday April 3 will be held in the Convention Center Lima, at eight o'clock in the evening.
every place has it's own spirit. you just need to tune into it.
User avatar
Alan
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 2771
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2005 5:10 pm
Contact:

Re: Peru Presidential Election

Postby Alan » Mon Mar 28, 2016 9:47 am

There is a good summary of the election published in the Peruvian Times: http://www.peruviantimes.com/14/mano-a- ... ori/26240/
ironchefchris
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 1642
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2012 11:10 pm
Location: Arequipa

Re: Peru Presidential Election

Postby ironchefchris » Mon Mar 28, 2016 8:23 pm

Now that we're closer to the election, I've noticed the people I talk with regularly formulating opinions beyond the usual "they're all corrupt." Many of the people I've spoken with were supporting Guzman and liked his "outsider" status. Some say they're now looking at Barnechea. My in-laws like PPK. My wife's still relatively unenthused and undecided at this point. Everyone I've spoken with says they don't want Keiko.

Saw a news report this morning showing poll results from theoretical matchups against Keiko in the second round of voting. PPK was the only one who beat her.
User avatar
JoshuS
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 307
Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 9:40 am

Re: Peru Presidential Election

Postby JoshuS » Fri Apr 01, 2016 6:54 am

One more proof the elections are a fraud, she's the anointed one like mentioned earlier.

"Peru’s electoral authority has ruled that presidential frontrunner Keiko Fujimori would not be disqualified from 2016 elections for alleged vote buying.

The JNE elections board ruled last week that Fujimori had not violated a new law which prohibits candidates from giving or promising gifts worth $6 when she attended a hip-hop and break-dancing event in Callao where contest winners won $89 in cash."


http://perureports.com/2016/03/24/exone ... elections/
User avatar
tomsax
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 1394
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 10:28 pm

Re: Peru Presidential Election

Postby tomsax » Fri Apr 01, 2016 2:35 pm

Who do people would be the best candidate of the candidates that want to run? I know some have been told they can,t. I have very little knowledge on the candidates. Of the two front runners I definely prefer PPK.He has experience and I think his policies aas declared are the most in line with my preference. At least from what I know. I associate the name Fujimori with corruption, suppression of a free press,, drug traffickig inspite of some positive things from from the fathers presidential period.
Tom
ironchefchris
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 1642
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2012 11:10 pm
Location: Arequipa

Re: Peru Presidential Election

Postby ironchefchris » Fri Apr 01, 2016 2:55 pm

Has Keiko ever done anything? Any accomplishments of note in the public or private sector?
ironchefchris
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 1642
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2012 11:10 pm
Location: Arequipa

Re: Peru Presidential Election

Postby ironchefchris » Mon Apr 04, 2016 9:16 am

Lol at Sergio's (disappeared?) comment on Keiko. I try not to hold the offspring accountable for the sins of the parents, but it's hard not to when it comes to politics where the offspring tend to rely on the same advisors/etc. as the parents.

Anybody watch the debate? First one I've seen in Perú. I was surprised. The political process in the states, crazy as it is, seems far less of a circus of corruption compared to Perú. Based on things such as road traffic, colas, etc., I was expecting a debate more like the US circus. Interesting to see how ordered it all was. Cutting off mikes of politicians when their allotted time is up. What a novel concept.

Overall I thought it was kind of dull. Fun to watch Fernando Olivera ("Popy" as my wife says he's called) continuously go after Garcia, as if talking about the Presidency was an afterthought. The big news I guess was at the end of the debate when Keiko signed a "Commitment of Honor" saying she wouldn't pardon her father, pull another 5 April, and give some control to opposition parties.

Think I'm still pulling for Barnachea.
User avatar
JoshuS
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 307
Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 9:40 am

Re: Peru Presidential Election

Postby JoshuS » Mon Apr 04, 2016 9:42 am

Keiko Fujimori and 12 other Peruvians mentioned for money laundering in the latest scandal: the leaked Panama Papers.

http://gestion.pe/politica/keiko-fujimo ... rs-2157592

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-35918844
ironchefchris
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 1642
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2012 11:10 pm
Location: Arequipa

Re: Peru Presidential Election

Postby ironchefchris » Mon Apr 04, 2016 10:40 am

That Panamanian money laundering story along with the Unaoil story are pretty interesting. Same as it ever was.

Wonder if Keiko's "Commitment of Honor" means anything at all to Keiko detractors or the Peruvian people in general, or if it's just a piece of paper. More empty promises.
curveball

Re: Peru Presidential Election

Postby curveball » Mon Apr 04, 2016 11:44 am

JoshuS wrote:Keiko Fujimori and 12 other Peruvians mentioned for money laundering in the latest scandal: the leaked Panama Papers.

http://gestion.pe/politica/keiko-fujimo ... rs-2157592

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-35918844



And my man Vlade P.
Say it ain't so!
User avatar
asgp
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 201
Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2015 9:42 pm

Re: Peru Presidential Election

Postby asgp » Mon Apr 04, 2016 10:05 pm

Keiko is my man... Well should I say my woman? :lol:
User avatar
caliguy
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 1210
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2012 3:55 pm
Location: Lima-13

Re: Peru Presidential Election

Postby caliguy » Tue Apr 05, 2016 4:03 pm

is any one else as confused as i am with all the political ads on banners with the symbols of shovels, PPK's and PPC's. numbers, marca asi, escribe, etc? this seems more complex than a driving test. are they purposely trying to confuse folks? what if you make a mistake while filling out the ballot? does it get rejected? it's no wonder Peru keeps getting the wrong President.
every place has it's own spirit. you just need to tune into it.
ironchefchris
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 1642
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2012 11:10 pm
Location: Arequipa

Re: Peru Presidential Election

Postby ironchefchris » Tue Apr 05, 2016 4:16 pm

I don't get why Keiko is so far ahead in the polls. I'm not saying there isn't a reason, just that I don't know what it is. From what I understand she hasn't really accomplished anything. The only reason she's a contender is because of her last name. Her big qualification seems to be a feeling of entitlement to the Presidency. I'm guessing she'd be as much of a puppet of her father's cronies currently working with her now as Bush was a puppet to Cheney, Rumsfeld, and all the other holdovers from Bush The Elder's administration and crowd. Is it that people liked her father and want to see his work continued and figure a vote for Keiko is the best way to accomplish this? Finish what the old man started? I'm open to being wrong on any or all of this, but if so, could someone explain for me/us what it is Keiko has done and what it is about her that should make me want to vote for her over any of her more experienced opponents?
User avatar
asgp
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 201
Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2015 9:42 pm

Re: Peru Presidential Election

Postby asgp » Tue Apr 05, 2016 10:20 pm

caliguy wrote:is any one else as confused as i am with all the political ads on banners with the symbols of shovels, PPK's and PPC's. numbers, marca asi, escribe, etc? this seems more complex than a driving test. are they purposely trying to confuse folks? what if you make a mistake while filling out the ballot? does it get rejected? it's no wonder Peru keeps getting the wrong President.


Same here, I just don't get all those symbols...
User avatar
asgp
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 201
Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2015 9:42 pm

Re: Peru Presidential Election

Postby asgp » Tue Apr 05, 2016 10:28 pm

ironchefchris wrote:I don't get why Keiko is so far ahead in the polls. I'm not saying there isn't a reason, just that I don't know what it is. From what I understand she hasn't really accomplished anything. The only reason she's a contender is because of her last name. Her big qualification seems to be a feeling of entitlement to the Presidency. I'm guessing she'd be as much of a puppet of her father's cronies currently working with her now as Bush was a puppet to Cheney, Rumsfeld, and all the other holdovers from Bush The Elder's administration and crowd. Is it that people liked her father and want to see his work continued and figure a vote for Keiko is the best way to accomplish this? Finish what the old man started? I'm open to being wrong on any or all of this, but if so, could someone explain for me/us what it is Keiko has done and what it is about her that should make me want to vote for her over any of her more experienced opponents?


At a glance...

Keiko has walked all over Peru and the provincias, not only in this presidential race, she has done this for many years and she knows the real problems of the people, as fas as I can tell. Also she has been the face of her political party, keeping it togheter from falling apart with this Fujimori trial and jail thing.

She has clearly stated that she is aware of the mistakes of her father and she said she wont be making those mistakes again.

To finish... many peruvians trust her to stop the crime just like her father stoped terrorism... who knows...

I don't vote, but I like this Keiko F ideas... thats all.
ironchefchris
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 1642
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2012 11:10 pm
Location: Arequipa

Re: Peru Presidential Election

Postby ironchefchris » Tue Apr 05, 2016 11:03 pm

A few people have told me she doesn't have much support from the middle class, but mostly from uneducated campesinos whose votes can easily be influenced with gifts of a kilo of sugar or rice.

She sounds to me like a professional politician with no real accomplishments and people are paying her to travel around and keep the party together after all the misdeeds of her father so that they can once again be the ones who can loot the treasury and take advantage of all that power has to offer. An empty suit doing the bidding of others, almost like US politician Marco Rubio, menos the part about the corrupt father with the humans rights and corruption issues. There's a lot of money to be made as a professional politician, no matter the country.

But I'm a cynic when it comes to politics, I dislike them all pretty much. Just some more than others. I can't really say anything for sure myself as far as having a strong opinion having only been here about three and half years. I'm interested though and am mostly passing on the opinions of those I talk with; friends, relatives of my wife, shopkeepers, taxi drivers, etc.. I'm guessing there's better, but I'm sure there's worse.
User avatar
tomsax
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 1394
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 10:28 pm

Re: Peru Presidential Election

Postby tomsax » Wed Apr 06, 2016 12:06 pm

ironchefchris wrote:I don't get why Keiko is so far ahead in the polls. I'm not saying there isn't a reason, just that I don't know what it is. From what I understand she hasn't really accomplished anything. The only reason she's a contender is because of her last name. Her big qualification seems to be a feeling of entitlement to the Presidency. I'm guessing she'd be as much of a puppet of her father's cronies currently working with her now as Bush was a puppet to Cheney, Rumsfeld, and all the other holdovers from Bush The Elder's administration and crowd. Is it that people liked her father and want to see his work continued and figure a vote for Keiko is the best way to accomplish this? Finish what the old man started? I'm open to being wrong on any or all of this, but if so, could someone explain for me/us what it is Keiko has done and what it is about her that should make me want to vote for her over any of her more experienced opponents?


My take is that it was impossible not to take a position on whether you were for or against her father in the 90's. Peruvians were very polarised on the subject but in general the majority of people were for him. He controlled the media so it's not that surprising. He basically became a cult figure. The attitudes of for and against where handing down to the youngsters also. Then when the Montesinos corruption scandel broke and other failings came to light a lot of people had to either admit they got it wrong, or keep hold of a very powerful idea in their heads. I remember in the early 2000s in Peru and people were still clinging on to the idea that he was stil in fact clean, that the critisism was just political, that he was just led astray or let down by Montesinos, that any critisism was a dismissal of anything that he was done that was valuable and must be rejected. People even now are still polarised. Admitting you have been wrong over the last 15 or more years is difficult to do. And if you can elect someone that will perhaps prove you were right all along and mean you can get your own back on all those smug guys who have been making fun of you for the last 15 years... People are stil incredibly polarised by Fujimori. I know a lot of people who will vote for Fujimori. Admitting they are wrong is just not an option for them.
Tom
ironchefchris
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 1642
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2012 11:10 pm
Location: Arequipa

Re: Peru Presidential Election

Postby ironchefchris » Wed Apr 06, 2016 12:27 pm

Sounds similar to what people who've been in a cult for a long time go through. After so many years you have so much invested financially and/or mentally that it's hard to give up, even if you know what you've believed all these years is utterly false. Cognitive dissonance.
User avatar
gringolandia
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 308
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 5:34 pm

Re: Peru Presidential Election

Postby gringolandia » Mon Apr 11, 2016 12:14 pm

Looks like it comes down to Keiko Fujimori of Fuerza Popular or Pedro Kuczynski of PPK. Thankfully the socialist (communist?) Mendoza won't make the cut.

I know plenty of people who support Keiko. I actually met her husband socially this summer and he's a nice guy (I was casually chatting with him and it was only later that my wife pointed out that he is Keiko's husband).

However, there are a LOT of people who will vote against Keiko no matter what. Unbelievably, plenty of highly educated PPK supporters my wife knows were saying they'd vote for Mendoza over Keiko if it came down to those two. The hate against Fujimori runs deep. Personally I don't get it. Sure, there was plenty of corruption in elder Fujimori's administration, but given the enormous good he did for the country it could almost be justified. How much would Peruvians be willing to pay to get rid of the Shining Path if they were to rise again..? How many collateral damage deaths would they accept? A bunch, I bet.

She does seem to lack any real legislative experience, though. She does quite a good job of rallying her party, but I haven't heard of any legislation she's actually passed.

Pedro Kuczynski claims to have the experience Keiko Fujimori lacks, though I don't know enough about his legislative history to know if that is true. He's certainly older than Keiko, anyway ;-)

The vast majority of the people I know are supporting PPK, and they're hoping that the anti-Keiko sentiment will be strong enough to win even though Keiko received about 40% of the first round vote. We'll see how it goes, but my guess is the final tally of the second round will indeed be a lot closer than a casual observer would expect.

In the meantime, might I suggest that Pedro Kuczynski print up a bunch of these shirts for his campaign:

Image
ironchefchris
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 1642
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2012 11:10 pm
Location: Arequipa

Re: Peru Presidential Election

Postby ironchefchris » Mon Apr 11, 2016 1:47 pm

I just don't get why eliminating Shining Path or doing something about terrorism should give one free reign to loot the treasury and engage in other forms of corruption. I don't see the correlation. It reads to me like Fujimori thought corruption was his reward for doing the job he campaigned for; like applying for a cash register job at Plaza Vea gives one the assumed right to help themselves to the cash they handle. Maybe he thought he deserved more than the President's salary? Maybe being corrupt is just an assumed perk of the job?

I liked the 'Vote for Pedro' t-shirt idea.
User avatar
gringolandia
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 308
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 5:34 pm

Re: Peru Presidential Election

Postby gringolandia » Mon Apr 11, 2016 2:27 pm

His administration was undeniably corrupt, but I don't think Fujimori himself was ever personally convicted of any corruption. My understanding (correct me if I'm wrong) is that he convicted for human rights abuses related to the "death squads" that were sent out to deal with terrorism. Apparently they killed a few innocent people along the way. As far as I'm concerned you're going to break a few eggs when making an omelette. Obama would be guilty of innocent civilians dying in drone strikes by the same standard (don't hold your breath waiting for that to happen).

But yea, obviously the people in his administration could not have been corrupt without him turning a blind eye to their activities, and that's wrong. It is pretty typical when have the sort of strong willed people in power who are necessary to take the steps necessary to fix big problems, though. A George Washington type of strong willed character who will turn down an offer to be made King is truly rare. So while I agree it isn't "right", from a completely pragmatic perspective I'm willing to let it pass. Which I guess in some way makes me similarly morally culpable, only to a lesser degree, as Fujimori looking the other way at the corrupt people in his administration. So be it, I've never claimed to be morally perfect :twisted:

The other open question is whether the sins of the father become the sins of the daughter? I thought Jesus was supposed to put an end to that, but I'm not religious so who knows :lol:

I'd prefer Pedro (though only my wife gets a vote), but I think Peru will most likely be fine either way.
ironchefchris
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 1642
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2012 11:10 pm
Location: Arequipa

Re: Peru Presidential Election

Postby ironchefchris » Mon Apr 11, 2016 3:00 pm

There's already tons of information from reputable sources re: Fujimori and corruption so no point in me making references or posting links.

Generally speaking, I agree about sins of the father/daughter, but when it comes to politics I'm not as forgiving. If the son/daughter was running against the father's policies in a party completely opposed to the father's I wouldn't hold the son/daughter accountable, but Keiko looks to be using the same people and pushing the same policies and agenda as her father. She may not be guilty for her father's sins, but she hasn't done anything sufficient enough (imo) to really distinguish herself as being her own person, separate from her father. Former US President Bush did pretty much the same, relying on people who worked for his father, people who may have been running the show the whole time.

I don't have a horse in this race by the way. I'm pretty much equally skeptical of all politicians. I just find of the two, PPK seems less distasteful, but I'm open to being wrong and wouldn't be surprised to find he has dirty hands as well.
User avatar
gringolandia
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 308
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 5:34 pm

Re: Peru Presidential Election

Postby gringolandia » Mon Apr 11, 2016 3:30 pm

Actually, if you have a link to an article saying Fujimori was convicted for corruption I'd like to see it. I'd like to get to the bottom of that question.

I've found quite a few articles that have headlines that say he was convicted for corruption, but when I read the details they only say he was found guilty of (1) a warrantless search and (2) human rights abuses.

I've yet to find an article that contains actual details about a conviction for corruption.

Though perhaps I'm using the wrong definition of corruption. Generally when using the word corruption with regard to politicians it strongly implies accepting money for political favors. Of course the more general definition just means becoming bad (dishonesty, fraud, succumbing to a lust for power). So even if there was no conviction for bribery, I suppose the word corruption can still technically be used.

So anyway, to be clear, I do not believe Fujimori has ever been convicted for bribery, but if there is an article that says otherwise please post it so I can get to the bottom of this. Thanks.
ironchefchris
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 1642
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2012 11:10 pm
Location: Arequipa

Re: Peru Presidential Election

Postby ironchefchris » Mon Apr 11, 2016 4:16 pm

From a Google search - Fujimori corruption conviction. One link of many:

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/former-peru ... orruption/

LIMA, Peru - A three-judge panel in Peru convicted jailed former President Alberto Fujimori on Thursday of funneling more than $40 million in public funds to tabloid newspapers that smeared his opponents during his 2000 re-election campaign.

The conviction was the fifth for the 76-year-old Fujimori.

The judges sentenced him to eight years in prison and fined him $1 million. The sentence will run concurrently with the stiffest he has received to date: 25 years for murder in the military death-squad killings of 25 people. He has two additional convictions for corruption and one for abuse of power.


There's plenty of other online information regarding other Fujimori corruption, such as his dealings with Montesinos, etc..

And I get the needing to 'crack a few eggs' metaphor but I don't think that's why Fujimori had to flee the country. There's a difference between collateral damage and intentional human rights abuses. People can make up their own minds of the significance of his having to flee the country while President and being wanted by Interpol. I myself don't look favorably on them or easily dismiss them. But I'm not Peruvian, wasn't around at time, and realize my viewpoint as an outsider.
User avatar
gringolandia
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 308
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 5:34 pm

Re: Peru Presidential Election

Postby gringolandia » Mon Apr 11, 2016 4:24 pm

Great, thanks!
ironchefchris
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 1642
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2012 11:10 pm
Location: Arequipa

Re: Peru Presidential Election

Postby ironchefchris » Mon Apr 11, 2016 4:33 pm

What's interesting to me, (and I guess how elections setup like Perú's with a first round and a second round of voting) is to see how the 30-something percent of those who supported neither Keiko or PPK will vote in the second round.

If this were the US where voting is optional a lot of those people wouldn't bother voting, but since voting is mandatory here Veronika's supporters are going to have to hold their noses and vote for someone. Assuming Keiko's and PPK's voters remain loyal, it looks like PPK needs to win around 2/3 of the votes of those who voted for someone else in order to win. It'll be interesting talking to people to see how the support of that near 40% will swing. Will they split it or has Keiko reached a ceiling with her support?

It was interesting seeing how support varied by state as well. Support in Arequipa was fairly close between the top three (PPK/Keiko/Veronika) so I guess if this were the US with an electoral college we'd be a battleground state. I guess the way it's set-up, the near 40% who voted for someone else are a sort of individualized battleground state. I prefer counting the votes of the people to a system that relies on an electoral college.

The craziest thing was not that Gregorio Santos was running for President from jail, but that he won the majority of the vote in his home state of Cajamarca.
User avatar
sbaustin
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 2057
Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2006 1:46 pm
Location: Peru
Contact:

Re: Peru Presidential Election

Postby sbaustin » Mon Apr 11, 2016 5:02 pm

Keiko lost the last election in the second round.. I suspect the people that hate Keiko are the same ones that voted for Veronika and the others. I'd be willing to bet (maybe s/1) PPK edges Keiko in the second round like Humala did.
User avatar
gringolandia
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 308
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 5:34 pm

Re: Peru Presidential Election

Postby gringolandia » Mon Apr 11, 2016 6:33 pm

ironchefchris wrote:The craziest thing was not that Gregorio Santos was running for President from jail, but that he won the majority of the vote in his home state of Cajamarca.


And was thus instrumental in keeping Veronica out of the top two. So... thanks..?
User avatar
tomsax
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 1394
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 10:28 pm

Re: Peru Presidential Election

Postby tomsax » Wed Apr 13, 2016 2:18 pm

I fear that it will be very close and that Kieko will win in the second round. A lot is at stake whea very small swing at the last minute could make a big impact on peoples lives.
Tom
jhand8pp4
Silver Member
Silver Member
Posts: 48
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2015 2:42 pm

Re: Peru Presidential Election

Postby jhand8pp4 » Wed Apr 13, 2016 2:45 pm

In the first round of the 2011 Presidential Election, Keiko received 23.551% of the vote. She increased it to 48.551% in the second round. Likewise, PPK received 18.512% of the vote in the first round of the 2011 elections. In the recent election, Keiko received approximately 39.83% of the vote whereas PPK received approximately 20.99%. I would think that Keiko is feeling good about her chances of winning.
MarcoPE
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 499
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 5:29 pm

Re: Peru Presidential Election

Postby MarcoPE » Thu Apr 14, 2016 12:35 pm

ironchefchris wrote:If this were the US where voting is optional a lot of those people wouldn't bother voting, but since voting is mandatory here Veronika's supporters are going to have to hold their noses and vote for someone.


Actually, you have to "vote" (or pay the fee).... but you DON"T have to vote for someone-you can just leave the ballot blank though not sure with the electronic process.

tomsax wrote:I fear that it will be very close and that Kieko will win in the second round.


Yes final numbers put Keiko at virtually double PPK ... granted I don't know all that many people in Peru, but I have yet to meet a single person that didn't vote for PPK, which I find incredibly odd considering the lead Keiko has :?
ironchefchris
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 1642
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2012 11:10 pm
Location: Arequipa

Re: Peru Presidential Election

Postby ironchefchris » Thu Apr 14, 2016 2:01 pm

That's true. I wonder how many will leave their ballots blank.

PPK has a tough campaign in front of him. Looks like to win Keiko only needs about 1 in 4 votes from those 39% who didn't vote for her or PPK in the first round. It'll be interesting to see how much of an anti-Fujimori sentiment exists, but judging on the '11 election where she picked up more than 25% in the second round it looks like this time it's her's to lose.
User avatar
gringolandia
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 308
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 5:34 pm

Re: Peru Presidential Election

Postby gringolandia » Thu Apr 21, 2016 1:24 am

ironchefchris wrote:It'll be interesting to see how much of an anti-Fujimori sentiment exists, but judging on the '11 election where she picked up more than 25% in the second round it looks like this time it's her's to lose.


The most recent polls seem to indicate she's not gaining much over what she received in the first round, which is surprising to me.

My wife claims that some of the people who voted for Keiko in the first round only did so to prevent Mendoza from getting to the second round, and that they will vote against Keiko in the second round. Who knows? I guess that could be true. It could go a long way towards explaining why she's not polling much higher than her first round results.
ironchefchris
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 1642
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2012 11:10 pm
Location: Arequipa

Re: Peru Presidential Election

Postby ironchefchris » Thu Apr 21, 2016 11:04 am

We were talking about those polls last night. I was kind of surprised. Makes things more interesting.

Read an old thread from five years ago where people were discussing what they'd do and what would likely happen to Perú should Humala win. Haven't seen or heard much in the way of similar reactions this election. Seems to me to be less about one or the other destroying the country and more about the impression given to world by electing the daughter of Fujimori to represent Perú. At least that's how I'm seeing it; I'm sure for others it's far more personal or there's a much deeper level of involvement.
hatchepsut
Silver Member
Silver Member
Posts: 33
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2016 9:22 am

Re: Peru Presidential Election

Postby hatchepsut » Fri Apr 29, 2016 4:40 am

Kuczynski will make the rich richer and the poor poorer. He will only support his kind of people.

Return to “Expat Conversations”

Login  •  Register