Alpineprince wrote:I suspect the Rothchilds !
teamoperu wrote:so how are we suposed to know if it was political or justified? Seems important to know if it was justified. Will this mean the end of Peruvian?
americorps wrote:Yes, I am one of the biggest cheerleaders for Peruvian Airlines as I have used them half a dozen times and found their rates low, flights ontime, customer service above par and experienced no problems with their planes.
However, they seem to be having some issues and the government has closed them down for 90 days after recently failing safety inspections.
I know this is a travel related issue, the reason I posted it here is that more people see this thread and the information may be of immediate concern to some. If Kelly feels it should go to travel, I totally understand.
Link below to article in Spanish
http://elcomercio.pe/economia/1054304/n ... n-airlines
Polaron wrote:Sebastián Piñera, president of Chile, owns controlling interest in LAN, and he has often been accused of corruption. In fact, in 2007 he was fined $680,000 for insider training in LAN stocks, according to the Huffington Post.
americorps wrote:Yes, they will resume most operations Saturday.
http://www.peruthisweek.com/news-434-Pe ... -Saturday/
ibanker wrote:LAN has a modern fleet and well trained and paid pilots. Why anyone would fly an airline like Peruvian using the oldest 737s available and that has now been suspended for safety violations is beyond me.
ibanker wrote:2 engine failures in one year in a very small fleet is dangerous. 25 year old airframes with thousands of cycles are dangerous.
You are still mad about the difference in fares for foreigners. Thats fine. LAN is still going to be the dominant airline here and you can be self righteous all you want about but it's not going to change anything.
If you are really that cheap, take the bus but watch out for the ravines.
ibanker wrote:2 engine failures in one year in a very small fleet is dangerous. 25 year old airframes with thousands of cycles are dangerous.
You are still mad about the difference in fares for foreigners. Thats fine. LAN is still going to be the dominant airline here and you can be self righteous all you want about but it's not going to change anything.
If you are really that cheap, take the bus but watch out for the ravines.
tupacperu wrote:ibanker wrote:2 engine failures in one year in a very small fleet is dangerous. 25 year old airframes with thousands of cycles are dangerous.
You are still mad about the difference in fares for foreigners. Thats fine. LAN is still going to be the dominant airline here and you can be self righteous all you want about but it's not going to change anything.
If you are really that cheap, take the bus but watch out for the ravines.
We take the bus Lima - Chiclayo. We like the scenic ride. Never in a hurry. Besides we leave at night and arrive in the morning , 12 hours. Caveat; we take Oltursa (1st class). Oltursa has 3 drivers for the 12 hour ride. When in Peru, we prefer the bus. Also for security Oltursa has metal detectors and video tapes all passengers. I like the point to point travel. Once the doors close they do not open until you reach your destination (Lima - Chiclayo). 2 movies and 2 meals. We prefer the bus over the airlines.
tupacperu wrote:ibanker wrote:2 engine failures in one year in a very small fleet is dangerous. 25 year old airframes with thousands of cycles are dangerous.
You are still mad about the difference in fares for foreigners. Thats fine. LAN is still going to be the dominant airline here and you can be self righteous all you want about but it's not going to change anything.
If you are really that cheap, take the bus but watch out for the ravines.
We take the bus Lima - Chiclayo. We like the scenic ride. Never in a hurry. Besides we leave at night and arrive in the morning , 12 hours. Caveat; we take Oltursa (1st class). Oltursa has 3 drivers for the 12 hour ride. When in Peru, we prefer the bus. Also for security Oltursa has metal detectors and video tapes all passengers. I like the point to point travel. Once the doors close they do not open until you reach your destination (Lima - Chiclayo). 2 movies and 2 meals. We prefer the bus over the airlines.
Icachico wrote:I'm with Ibanker on this one. I gladly pay a little more for quality, professional service and peace of mind that I am flying in a better maintained airplane.
And if the bus is too expensive for you, there's always your thumb.
Icachico wrote:My only experience with LAN has been on international flights & nothing but a great experience with great customer service which is night & day compared to the airlines here in the states.
Maybe you will reconsider LAN if you ever make any international flights.
americorps wrote:Your comments are really charged and transparent.
Lan, by the way, was responsible for the worst air accident in Chilean history and has a list of accidents and safety violations of their own and more than 150 Lan passengers have been killed flying their planes.
How many have been killed or injured on Peruvian Airlines? Oh yea...none.
el conquistador wrote:
The LAN group exists since 1929. Peruvian airlines is less than 2 years old. Aircrafts were less reliable and safety procedures were less strictly in the past. So, you cannot compare the safety record off both airlines.
Still note that Peruvian airlines is using Boeings that are over 30 years old whilst LAN Peru is using modern and recent AIRBUS aircrafts.
honestly, I do not think that Lan is dangerous, but I do not believe that Peruvian Airlines is life threatening.
Icachico wrote:But those statistics are skewed. LAN is older certainly there would be more of a history of incidents & accidents.
Peruvian Airlines is only 2 years old. Give 'em time and going by the expose that ibanker posted,
it's just a matter of time.
Icachico wrote:Ok, I'm a little confused about this so please forgive me if this is a dumb question but can't you get that CE thingy, become legal, then buy a domestic LAN ticket @ the lower Peruvian price as a Peruvian resident?
Kindly explain, thanks.